Attorney Jeanine Pirro has now begun an investigation into Senator Adam Schiff
BREAKING: U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro has now begun an investigation into Senator Adam Schiff.ABOUT TIME!Senator Adam Schiff (D-CA) is sweating bullets today after immensely popular Fox News host Jeanine Pirro, now serving as the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, went on conservative commentator Benny Johnson’s podcast and suggested she has begun an investigation into him and his “shifty” actions while serving the public.
The investigation will look into Schiff’s potential involvement in leaking classified information related to Russia, a matter that Pirro told Johnson falls within her area of expertise.
In the interview, Pirro said, “Benny, I think you know that this is my wheelhouse. The difference between me and some others is that I don’t talk about what I’m investigating. When I have the evidence and enough to go forward, you will hear from me loud and clear.”
A statement like this indicates Pirro means business and is taking this matter very seriously, despite not revealing any specifics related to the current probe. And this isn’t the only trouble Schiff could be facing on the legal front.
WATCH:
The senator is also being investigated for alleged mortgage fraud, a story reported by Fox News. A member of President Donald Trump’s administration recently revealed that Schiff is under scrutiny for allegedly falsifying documents to secure a better loan, a crime for which Trump himself was charged by New York Attorney General Letitia James.
Ironically, she, too, is under investigation for that very same crime.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency expressed a variety of concerns about the practice, pointing out that it could undermine the mortgage system’s integrity.
Making Schiff’s life even more complicated, a Democrat whistleblower has come out of the shadows and alleged the California senator approved the leaking of classified information to damage President Trump during his first term at the height of the Russiagate scandal.
The whistleblower, who is a career intelligence officer, issued a warning to the FBI on several occasions in 2017 concerning Schiff’s actions. The Justice Department, however, neglected to look into the matter.
Now that the bureau is being led by Director Kash Patel, the situation is being looked into and has already started fresh debates concerning Schiff’s time spent on the House Intelligence Committee.
President Trump has been critical of Schiff for a long time, but has recently suggested that it’s time for him to start being held accountable for his actions and face the consequences of what he’s done.
AOC Takes On Senator John Kennedy—What Happened Next Left Congress Stunned
AOC’s Onslaught Backfires: Senator John Kennedy’s Masterclass Leaves Congress Stunned
In an unforgettable moment on Capitol Hill, what was supposed to be another viral congressional takedown by New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) turned into a jaw-dropping defeat that’s now being called “the most satisfying conservative victory in YouTube history.”
The atmosphere inside the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing buzzed with anticipation. AOC, known for her fierce questioning and social media prowess, was expected to put Senator John Kennedy—often underestimated for his Southern charm and folksy wit—on the defensive. Instead, it was Kennedy who delivered the political equivalent of a knockout, leaving even some mainstream media unable to shield the progressive superstar from embarrassment.
.
.
.
A Progressive Attack, An Unexpected Defense
The drama began when AOC, speaking with signature passion, took aim at Kennedy’s perceived privilege and “elitist” attitude. “How can someone who’s never struggled possibly understand working families?” she said, her voice echoing off the marble walls. To her, Kennedy seemed the perfect target: an older, white, Republican male senator with a gentle accent and patient manner.
But, as the hearing unfolded, it became clear AOC had walked into a well-laid trap. With a calm smile, Kennedy revealed his own rags-to-Rhodes Scholar story: magna cum laude from Vanderbilt, Oxford constitutional law studies, and decades of public service.
“I surely do appreciate your concern about privilege,” Kennedy drawled, before referencing his blue-collar Mississippi upbringing and academic journey. Then, he quietly placed a stack of official documents on the table, shifting the momentum.
“Let’s Talk About Your Taxpayer Dollars…”
Kennedy began unveiling House Ethics Committee reports, connecting AOC’s public crusades with her own financial decisions. First up, those infamous “tax the rich” moments—the Met Gala dress, social media photo-ops, and more. “Can you remind the American people where exactly you wore this message?” Kennedy pressed.
AOC responded with familiar talking points about “using platforms to advocate for working families.” But Kennedy calmly read from ethics reports: “According to these committee records, Met Gala tickets cost upwards of $35,000. You attended as a ‘champion of the people,’ yet accepted thousands in gifts, apparel, and admission for your partner—gifts ruled impermissible by House ethics.”
AOC tried to pivot: “Senator, this is exactly the kind of sexist attack that tries to shut out voices like mine—” but Kennedy, unfazed, replied, “The Constitution doesn’t care about your demographics. It cares about your integrity.”
Dance Lessons, Fine Dining, and Social Media Exposed
The revelations didn’t stop at the red carpet. Kennedy turned to AOC’s expense reports: payments for salsa dance lessons, luxury restaurant bills, and designer furnishings, all allegedly documented under official congressional expenditures.
He held up receipts and Instagram screenshots, then asked, “Can you explain how spending more on a single dinner than your constituents earn in a week demonstrates your solidarity with their struggles?”
The chamber was pin-drop silent as AOC shifted in her seat, her usual edge blunted. “You’re weaponizing poverty,” she protested, but Kennedy pressed on: “George Washington communicated without taxpayer-funded dance lessons. Our founders set a higher bar for public service.”
The Constitutional Divide
Kennedy’s real competence, however, came into focus when he shifted from spending habits to AOC’s legislative agenda. “Representative, can you cite the specific constitutional authority for the Green New Deal and sweeping federal controls?” he asked, referencing the limitations of the interstate commerce clause and the 10th Amendment.
AOC, usually at her best on climate policy in sound bites, faltered. As Kennedy cited Federalist Papers and historical failures of central planning, even AOC’s supporters appeared visibly uncomfortable. When she tried to answer, her responses were vague and met with calm Constitutional counterpoints.
Kennedy pointedly noted, “The founders designed our system to prevent concentration of power. Your plan would override local control and bankrupt the nation—something even James Madison warned against.”
Foreign Policy and Public Safety: The Final Act
The senator then drew attention to AOC’s voting record on Israel and her support for movements to defund the police. With statistics in hand, Kennedy contended, “Your policies are getting more people killed in the communities you claim to defend. Rising crime, weakened alliances—is this the justice you propose?”
AOC’s usual charisma was no match for Kennedy’s calm, data-driven rebuke.
A Masterclass in Scholarship and Service
The final blow was perhaps the most devastating. Kennedy closed with a brief but powerful autobiography, tracing his journey from small-town Mississippi to Oxford, and his dedication to public service anchored in America’s founding principles.
“You’ve spent years making viral videos; I’ve spent decades studying law, serving the people, and fighting to preserve a Constitution you don’t seem to understand,” he concluded.
His closing words echoed:
Aftermath: A Viral Earthquake
Within hours, clips from the hearing lit up the internet. Hashtags like #KennedySchooling and #AOCExposed topped the trends. Even traditional allies hesitated to offer support as memes, news segments, and analysis celebrated Kennedy’s “masterclass in constitutional government.”
In the days following, conservative talk shows and even some mainstream channels dissected the hearing, citing it as a watershed moment of substance over spectacle. Law professors and political analysts pointed to the exchange as a “case study in leadership, humility, and the difference between scholarship and shallow activism.”
AOC retreated from media appearances, while her fundraising emails saw a sharp drop-off. Meanwhile, Kennedy’s approval soared, and demand for his insights into constitutional law reached new heights, with university invitations and even a “Kennedy for President” buzz amongst fans.
